A shot of JD

Jonathan Deamer's tumblelog: for when proper writing is just too much effort. if you want, follow me on Twitter or take a random shot.

Posts tagged advertising

Sep 29
I clicked this ad because I wanted to find out the answer (300-400%).  And after the clickthrough, there were a couple of interesting paragraphs in answer to the question, plus of course some details about Monster, but not in a hard-sell kinda way.
I thought this was cool advertising as it added value for me as the reader. I was reading an article about startups, so am likely to be interested in business, employment etc.  The trouble is differentiating these genuine “value adding” interactive ads from spammy “VOTE IN THIS SURVEY AND WIN AN IPOD!!!!1” type ads.
Further, while this ad made my experience better and may make people less resentful of ads in content that they demand to have for free, I wonder whether it’s worthwhile for Monster?  If they’re paying for the ad on a cost-per-click basis, maybe they don’t want my click - I’m not looking for work or to employ someone, and only clicked through because I like nerdy trivia and stats.
If this sort of advertising is offered on a CPC basis (I don’t know whether it is or not), I’d suspect it results in higher-than-usual clickthroughs but lower-than-usual conversions.  Good for brand-building, less so for financial ROI.

I clicked this ad because I wanted to find out the answer (300-400%).  And after the clickthrough, there were a couple of interesting paragraphs in answer to the question, plus of course some details about Monster, but not in a hard-sell kinda way.

I thought this was cool advertising as it added value for me as the reader. I was reading an article about startups, so am likely to be interested in business, employment etc.  The trouble is differentiating these genuine “value adding” interactive ads from spammy “VOTE IN THIS SURVEY AND WIN AN IPOD!!!!1” type ads.

Further, while this ad made my experience better and may make people less resentful of ads in content that they demand to have for free, I wonder whether it’s worthwhile for Monster?  If they’re paying for the ad on a cost-per-click basis, maybe they don’t want my click - I’m not looking for work or to employ someone, and only clicked through because I like nerdy trivia and stats.

If this sort of advertising is offered on a CPC basis (I don’t know whether it is or not), I’d suspect it results in higher-than-usual clickthroughs but lower-than-usual conversions.  Good for brand-building, less so for financial ROI.


Sep 28
iamdanw:
Drivers’ details sold by DVLA are used in roadside adverts  - Creepy in a minority report way. Roadside cameras photographed registration plates on passing cars and displayed adverts customised to the engine types of individual passing vehicles.
(via publiccommunication)
It might be scary, but it’s kinda clever. The online-marketing-bod part of me is salivating, while trying to kick the civil-liberties part of me in the shins.

iamdanw:

Drivers’ details sold by DVLA are used in roadside adverts - Creepy in a minority report way. Roadside cameras photographed registration plates on passing cars and displayed adverts customised to the engine types of individual passing vehicles.

(via publiccommunication)

It might be scary, but it’s kinda clever. The online-marketing-bod part of me is salivating, while trying to kick the civil-liberties part of me in the shins.


Sep 22
whitneymcn:

(via John Borthwick)
Cool for bit.ly, of course, but it’s fascinating how totally based on this particular moment in time this ad is, and that it would have been totally incomprehensible to much of Advertising Week’s audience just a year ago.
Plus: kind of interesting that by including a bit.ly URL (in part for verisimilitude, I assume), they automatically get one metric for tracking the effectiveness of their ad. And they also make the data public.
266 clicks as of right now? I would have guessed higher, just for the novelty/curiousity factor.

I still imagine there will be some old-school ad execs wondering what the hell is going on though.  I love it for sheer geeky innovation though.

whitneymcn:

(via John Borthwick)

Cool for bit.ly, of course, but it’s fascinating how totally based on this particular moment in time this ad is, and that it would have been totally incomprehensible to much of Advertising Week’s audience just a year ago.

Plus: kind of interesting that by including a bit.ly URL (in part for verisimilitude, I assume), they automatically get one metric for tracking the effectiveness of their ad. And they also make the data public.

266 clicks as of right now? I would have guessed higher, just for the novelty/curiousity factor.

I still imagine there will be some old-school ad execs wondering what the hell is going on though.  I love it for sheer geeky innovation though.